venus 2010-8-8 05:03 AM
夏日戀人2
Nikon D300 12-24 f/4 17-55 f/2.8 85 f/1.4
1
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5819.jpg[/IMG]
2
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5839.jpg[/IMG]
3
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5852.jpg[/IMG]
4
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5860.jpg[/IMG]
5
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5919.jpg[/IMG]
6
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5937.jpg[/IMG]
7
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5942.jpg[/IMG]
8
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5947.jpg[/IMG]
9
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5969a.jpg[/IMG]
10
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_5971a.jpg[/IMG]
11
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_6038.jpg[/IMG]
12
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_6050.jpg[/IMG]
13
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_6053.jpg[/IMG]
14
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_6064.jpg[/IMG]
15
[IMG]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa134/m2v_photos/Mui%20Mui%20and%20Pong/DSC_6082a.jpg[/IMG]
[url=http://www.fotop.net/InnoImage/muimui][color=SeaGreen][size=5]Full Version[/size][/color][/url]
iceluk 2010-8-9 11:44 AM
光線靚，構圖好
逆光那幾張的光線處理得很好！ :good:
venus 2010-8-9 12:52 PM
六叔都好鍾意玩逆光喎。果日如果冇人打板就只能影#11果種，#12-14係影唔到。:thank:
doingcool 2010-8-15 04:36 PM
請教如何打板呢? 舉高45度，還有什麼變化?
venus 2010-8-15 06:46 PM
打板係受制於陽光角度，冇得揀係咪45度啦，你留心今次打落塊面都係由下向上。而陽光係背面，反射光自然係正面。
不過佢好過用閃係即時見到效果，有時我會覺得用銀色太勁，會揀用白色。其實無論打板或用閃補光，目的都係平衡返主體同背景既曝光值。至於你到底想背景爆d，或暗d，就視乎你的創意了。
[[i] 本帖最後由 venus 於 2010-8-16 01:18 AM 編輯 [/i]]
doingcool 2010-8-16 12:02 PM
原來如此，沒有太仔細留意tim...抵打:cry:
但為什麼這次由下到上呢? 這樣會不會不自然呢?
除了控制暴光，會不會控制陰影(例如，鼻影，從而令臉部比較瘦?)
venus 2010-8-16 09:42 PM
[quote]原帖由 [i]doingcool[/i] 於 2010-8-16 12:02 PM 發表 [url=http://www.hkfreezone.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=5738194&ptid=1203175][img]http://www.hkfreezone.com/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
原來如此，沒有太仔細留意tim...抵打:cry:
但為什麼這次由下到上呢? 這樣會不會不自然呢?
除了控制暴光，會不會控制陰影(例如，鼻影，從而令臉部比較瘦?) [/quote]
理論上可以，仲可以配合埋化粧打影，不過要玩到咁似乎係studio會比較操控到每一細節。我都未試過玩到咁喎。戶外人像貴乎自然，你咁搞得黎，model都硬晒呔啦。現代影人像都崇尚自然，同model溝通和捕捉才是最重要呢。其實任可光源都有利用價值的，不一定要則光或逆光先叫靚，也不一定要兩面補晒光岩晒1:3，單邊光讓另一邊黑掉又是另一種感覺。
用反光板要接住陽光再反到臉上，唔多唔少都係下向上架啦。我覺得只要唔係個鼻影遮左眼，顴骨影左上額頭鬼一樣就得啦。呢幾張你起初都唔覺証明冇唔自然啦。